Most landlords who let a property in good faith assume the person applying is who they say they are. For a long time, that assumption held up reasonably well. Referencing checks were straightforward, documents were either genuine or obviously not, and fraud was the exception rather than something to plan around.
That's changing. New data shows 41 in every 1,000 tenancy applications now show signs of suspected fraud, a rise of almost 40% on the year before, and the tools available to fraudsters have become significantly more sophisticated. This article looks at what'sdriving the rise, what it costs landlords when it goes wrong, and what reduces the risk.
Tenant fraud isn't new, what's new is the scale and the sophistication. A few years ago, fraud usually meant a single weak point in an application. A payslip that had clearly been altered, a reference that read a little too perfectly. Small inconsistencies that stood out.
Rather than editing one document, fraudsters are now constructing entire fake identities: a fabricated employer, a doctored set of bank statements, and an invented referee who's in on the story from the start. Each piece is designed to support the others, so a landlord or agent checking any single document in isolation may find nothing obviously wrong.
The scale of this shows up clearly in the data. Fake employment references have risen by more than 225% in the past year, false landlord references by close to 150%, and fabricated identities by around 140%. Nearly all confirmed cases of tenant fraud, well over 90%, now involve some form of fake or manipulated document. London currently sees the highest concentration of suspected fraud, followed by the West Midlands and the North West, and higher-value rentals are being targeted more frequently than the market average.
The reason this has become so much more common comes down to accessibility. Generating a convincing fake payslip or bank statement used to require real skill. Today, AI tools can produce documents that are visually indistinguishable from genuine ones in a matter of minutes, and they're freely available to anyone who wants to use them.
That changes what "reasonable diligence" looks like. Checks that were sufficient a few years ago may no longer be enough on their own.
When fraud does get through, the financial exposure is significant. Industry research puts the average direct cost of a fraudulent tenancy at over £9,600 per case, once legal costs, court and bailiff fees, rent arrears, void periods and property damage are all accounted for. Scaled across the private rented sector, the potential exposure runs into billions of pounds annually.
It isn't only about the money lost during the tenancy itself. A fraudulent tenant is also more likely to fall into arrears, and if the situation deteriorates to the point where possession needs to be regained, that process currently takes an average of seven to eleven months in England and eight to twelve months in Scotland. If you'd like to understand that process in more detail, our blog on what landlords need to know about regaining possession walks through what's changed and how to prepare.
Landlord sentiment reflects this. Recent research found that 77% of landlords believe tenant fraud has become more common over the past three years, and 41% say they're actively concerned about it in the current market.
The instinct when fraud is mentioned is often to assume a credit check and a reference or two will catch it. In many cases, that's still true. But the type of fraud that's increased most sharply over the past year is specifically designed to pass exactly those checks.
A forged payslip that's internally consistent, cross-references correctly against a fabricated employer, and is backed up by a referee who will confirm the story on the phone, doesn't fail a basic reference check, it passes one. The weaknesses only tend to surface later, when something doesn't quite add up: an employer who has no record of the person on the books, a credit history that doesn’t align with the income being claimed, or a pattern that matches a previous fraudulent application.
This is why thorough referencing increasingly needs to go beyond taking documents at face value. It means verifying details independently rather than relying solely on the contact information an applicant provides, and where possible, using services that can identify the structural signs of a document that's been generated or tampered with, rather than relying on whether it looks right at a glance.
Thorough referencing still works, because fraud generally relies on shortcuts being taken somewhere in the process.
A few habits make a real difference:
Never skip referencing, even when an applicant seems ideal or there's pressure to fill a void period quickly. The tenants most keen to move fast are not automatically the ones committing fraud, but urgency is a tool fraudsters rely on, precisely because it discourages landlords from checking properly.
Contact employers and previous landlords directly, using a landline or verified business number rather than a mobile number supplied in the application. A mobile number provided by the applicant can just as easily belong to an accomplice posing as a genuine employer.
Be cautious of any applicant offering to pay several months' rent upfront in order to bypass the usual referencing process. This is a well-established pattern used specifically to avoid the checks most likely to catch fraud.
Use a professional referencing service with the tools to verify documents properly, rather than relying on checks that only confirm a name and a number. The more sophisticated fraud has become, the more the referencing process itself needs to reflect that.
Our own process is structured with this in mind, at every stage of finding a tenant for your property, not only at the point of formal referencing.
Before a viewing is even arranged, we ask prospective tenants to provide further information through our pre-screening system, giving us a clear picture of who someone is and whether they're a serious, financially sound applicant, before they set foot in your property.
From there, our referencing checks go beyond the basics. Documents and financial information are screened using advanced forensic analysis tools that examine far more than whether something simply looks right on the surface, checking for hidden inconsistencies that indicate a document has been generated or tampered with, even when it looks entirely genuine.
Forged documents that look convincing at a glance are exactly what this level of checking is designed to catch. It doesn't rely on something looking wrong to the eye, it looks at what's behind the document itself.
The result is a process built to catch what fraud looks like today, not what it looked like a few years ago, without adding unnecessary delay to letting your property.
Tenant fraud is more sophisticated than it used to be, and the tools available to fraudsters aren't going away. But the fundamentals of protecting yourself haven't changed as much as it might seem. Thorough referencing, independent verification, and a healthy scepticism toward anything that feels rushed remain the strongest defence available, whatever tools sit behind them.
Much of that protection starts at the very beginning of a tenancy, before a fraudulent applicant ever gets close to moving in.
Our guide, Getting Your Tenancy Set Up Right, walks through the areas landlords need to review before a tenancy begins, from referencing and deposit protection to building the kind of paper trail that protects you if anything does go wrong later.
Prefer to talk it through? Our Letting Experts are local business owners in your area, not employees working to someone else's targets, or waiting for someone else to come back to them before a question can get answered.
Each one is personally accountable for the running of their business, which means your property gets the attention and care of one person committed to getting it right.